Ryan: I’m the one wronged

(CNS Business): Following a ruling last week in the Cayman Islands Grand Court by Sir Peter Cresswell, the developer of the Ritz Carlton, Michael Ryan, has denied any wrongdoing, claiming it is he who is owed millions of dollars and that he intends to fight the case against him and pursue his counter claims to the end. Denying that he had taken any money from the companies relating to Cayman’s five-star resort, Ryan stated that he is the one being wronged in what is becoming a complex dispute and described the actions against him by the receivers as “surprising and desperate”, which he said would be revealed in his defense due to be filed in the courts next month.

In a statement to the press on Monday, 8 October, following what in his opinion were “misleading” reports, Ryan said that the allegations against him were based on “misreadings of bank statements”. The former owner of the Ritz did not indicate which news reports he felt were misleading or in which publication but added that, while he not wish to try legal disputes in the press, some things needed clarification.

The first report of the Cresswell ruling appeared on the website of the Miami-based watchdog Offshore Alert, which was followed by a story on CNS Business last week. Since then, other news houses have reported on the revelations in the court ruling, including The Caymanian Compass, which ran a lead story on Friday which attributed statements by Ryan’s attorneys to the judge, followed by a different version of the story on Monday with the correct attributions on page 9.

In the ruling delivered by Cresswell Ryan was accused by the receivers of taking some $44 million from the various companies associated with the resort that have not been properly explained. Ryan has denied that this was the case and his lawyers have accused the receivers of assuming that something that is unexplained must be wrong.

Contrary to the claims by the receivers and RC Cayman, which is the company taking action against Ryan in pursuit of a debt of over US$250 million, the former owner says that it is he that is owed millions after working for free and lending the companies money. Most of the companies involved in the ownership of the Ritz, however, were predominantly owned by Ryan – a point noted by the judge in his ruling.

“I was left being owed millions of dollars of outstanding salary, fees and loans I personally made to the companies,” Ryan said in his press statement Monday. “The first thing I was told by the receivers and their attorneys was that they would not honour any of the obligations to me or my companies.  They then started legal proceedings against me, less than a month after the date of their appointment.” He added that these allegations against him were based on select company bank statements that had been misread. 

“Ernst and Young has been auditing the companies for years and the accounts are there to be seen by the receivers. Had I been systematically taking millions from the companies then the auditors might have been expected to notice,” Ryan said. “In light of this I find the receivers’ approach both surprising and desperate, as will be demonstrated in the defense that is due to be filed next month.”

Stating that he intended to pursue his defense and counter claims to the end, Ryan said he was confident that people would see that he devoted all his efforts to seeing the project survive and acted properly at all times. “I am the one who has been wronged and is owed funds from the project,” he said.

Ryan added that for the last fifteen years he had devoted himself to the creation and operation of the Ritz with the goal of creating the finest resort in the region. He said that over a billion dollars of economic impact was delivered and thousands of jobs created. “As the world has struggled through the current economic crisis I did everything possible to maintain the value of the project, its reputation and also the reputation of Cayman,” Ryan stated.

“I worked without pay for many years and invested funds to try and keep the project going while working on a restructuring of the project debt,” the former owner said.  “These efforts were unsuccessful and the lender controlling the senior debt stack, Five Mile Capital, decided, with no advance notice, to place the properties in receivership, something I heard about after it was announced in the press.”

Ryan said he believed that the majority of people agreed with him, “notwithstanding the salacious pleasure some people get from seeing someone’s name smeared,” he noted, adding that there are two sides to every story.
See full press statement below.

Related articles:

Ryan moved $44m from Ritz (October 2012)

Ritz goes on auction block (September 2012)

Ritz-Carlton faces takeover (February 2012)

Comments

Boo Hoo!   Poor Mr. Ryan !  We are so sorry for you !  NOT !  This is one person who has got a lot of nerve, trying to claim he is the victim here.   Pay up the $6M owed and then we can talk about it.

If anyone has listened to David Marchant and a few others not too long ago we would not have this mess. The Ryan situation is very similar to the Jean Doucet situation in the early seventies. Everyone wanted a piece of the action and no one did a real due diligence. Then the auditors refused to give a clean audit report and got fired for their trouble. A certain knight said business as usual and it was for a couple of years when the bank went bust. Message here and First Cayman Bank, listen to the auditors, but only the good ones.

Just google the many lawsuite againt Michael Ryan and make your own decision if he is without sins and has come to the table with clean  hands.   Being the bilionaire that he claims to be no wonder the world is after him and not Bill Gates, Warren Buffett and Paul Allen just to name a few within the billionaire circle.   Mr. Billionaire Michael Ryan you have nothing to fear about the lawsuite you are one of the most honest person in the world and the best investor to every come to the Cayman Islands.  You singlehanded saved the economy of these islands, there are no unemployment in these islands because you provide jobs for all the natives, you pay all your bills on time and the government is very solvent because you pay your bills on time.   You are the best investor ever you are a wonderful investor and citizen.  The boat captains at Safehaven are so grateful for the wonderful marina that you have developed.  You are the best investors ever and without you the Cayman Islands would be lost.

Is that a three-piece lawsuite?

Sure the Hon. Michael Ryan is the victim, he was also the victim in the Costa Rica fiasco in another of his development and the many lawsuite that were brought against him since construction of the Ritz Carlton to date.  Michael Ryan is a victim and will continue to be a victim until his actions changes or the system forces him to change.
 
 
 

Me thinks he protest too much.

Like Father like son.

If it is shown that the various companies in Receivership, were trading whilst insolvent, and Ryan was still a director, then surely if they are put into Liquidation, he could be personally liable, together with any other directors - who knew, or should have known, that the companies were insolvent.

Ah, if only Cayman had a civilized modern regime for directors' misconduct.  But it does not because of Dutch disease. 

Thanks for mentioning directors' misconduct which I have personally wittered about for donkey's years. It seems that people put their blnikers on and just think of hedge funds. As I informed CIMA at a meeting on Monday, there is more to life than hedge funds directors. Directors need to be monitored no matter what their profession. We need a directors' disquailification law which can be dealt with by the Director of Public Prosecutions. It is not rocket scientist stuff. Directors need to be accountable and not revel in creating Phoenix companies once one goes belly up. Will the next Government please fix as this one is totally incapable of doing it.
 

Dutch disease is a concept that explains the apparent relationship between the increase in exploitation of natural resources and a decline in the manufacturing sector.  Cayman has neither natural resources nor a manufacturing sector, so while I agree that there is a lack in modern corporate governance in Cayman (surprise surprise), I'm not following your Dutch disease reference.

You can use Wikipedia?  The concept has expanded from the narrow original scope of mainly oil producing states to refer to economies which are over dependent on a single source of income and which thereafter have been over-influenced by meeting the needs of those involved in that sector.  It is in that wider context that Dutch disease is used in respect of certain offshore jurisdictions. 

No it hasn't.  The concept deals with the increase in the value of a currency due to the sales of an in-demand and highly valued resource, leading to more expensive exports in the manufacturing sector for buyers using other currencies (due to the less favourable exchange into the inflated currency of the resource-based economy), leading in turn to the loss of business in the manufacturing sector.  An example of this is what is happening in Canada with the oil and gas driving up the currency, leading to difficulty in the manurafcuring sector in selling onto the USA due to the relative increase in price.  Cayman's currency is pegged to the US, so none of that applies.  The concept has not expanded since its core remains as an analysis of currency, and Wikipedia would show that.
Live long and prosper.

You are quite correct but with no money who will take on the liquidation? Chris Johnson is the man. We know he takes no prisoners and is probably the best guy to sort the crap out. Problem is someone has to pay fees for the forensic work. Like the rubbish at First Cayman Bank the carpet will cover all as it did in Tempora.

Don't be so sure Tempura has been buried. There's another big story breaking shortly on this and it's messy. I'm now retired so have plenty of time to work on Tempura and it doesn't cost anyone a penny. Trust me it isn't going to go away.

It is amazing that a guy can come to the island with nothing and now have all the traps of leisure and still call himself a victim.
XXXX

This man is unbelievable. I'm sure he will hire the best lawyers 44 million can buy to spout his Cayman business fairy tale.

This man has been taking lessons in doing the ''double talk two step''  from Bush
Amazing...

Leave Michael Ryan alone.  He has done more good for this country than most of the "greedy"  TRUE born Caymanians can ever do.  And do remember... there are definately two sides to the story.  I have a lot of time Mr Ryan and no matter what people think and even though he may have gotten into financial difficulities over the past several years; just like the majority of us did I do not believe that  he ever or will ever try and dupe funds from ANYONE....
 

Not sure which greedy Caymanians you are referring to, but so far I haven't heard of any of them being able to stiff govt $6mil .  But if that's acceptable to you, you might reconsider your own judgement.

Interestingly he uses the same false logic that most financial conmen use when brought to book  - namely spouting a lot of confusing stuff about being owed money himself, whose money went where and on whose say-so etc. A layman can become tangled up with such logic quite quickly, but I'm confident the Receivers and the Court will sort it out. Not saying he IS a conman, just that these are tactics they often employ.............. :-)

Even Madoff and Stanford were audited and so were BCCI and First Cayman Bank. Perhaps Mr Ryan could produce the audit report so we can make sure there are no nasties in it.

Thing is, Mr Ryan, it appears your companies have not been paying their bills. If there is anything left after the bills are paid, I don't think anyone would object to you having it.

Who are his lawyers this week?

More importantly, who were his companies' lawyers while one or more may have continued trading as an insolvent entity?

Add new comment

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <!-->
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.