Port limited to GT & Spotts

(CNS Business): The government’s negotiations with China Harbour Engineering Company for the development of cruise berthing facilities have been confined to George Town and Spotts, sources close to the talks told CNS Business this week. Speculation that a deal has already been signed by the premier was dismissed Wednesday but sources stated that the talks could lead to a full agreement shortly that would not include the development of piers in either West Bay or Cayman Brac. In addition, sources state that the cost of the project is now estimated to be around $220 million, contrasting with recent estimates that it could exceed $300 million.

It is now more than 18 months since the premier terminated talks with GLF Construction for a $150 million proposal that included two finger piers and a smaller terminal development, turning instead to the Chinese firm.

CNS understands that while the West Bay and Cayman Brac projects are no longer part of the talks, the Spotts renovation will shortly be going out to tender for local contractors. Plans have been submitted to the planning department with a coastal works application before Cabinet. It is not clear, however, if an environmental impact assessment (EIA) is being planned for the Spotts jetty upgrade.

Although the firm has been at the centre of a number of controversies in the region and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office has said it is unlikely to approve any deals with CHEC that do not follow international procurement practice, the premier has stated that he intends to continue talks with the Beijing-based company. Alongside the UK’s concerns, the CHEC port proposal has also generated considerable local opposition, mostly centred on the choice of developer and the growing size and cost of the proposals.

Following months of silence on the subject, while Bush was still in China at a financial service conference this week, the regional representatives for CHEC released on official statement on Wednesday saying that an announcement will soon be made to update the Cayman Islands public on the current status of the project.

Describing the talks between the firm and the CIG as successfully making progress, officials from CHEC said that once the port was complete Cayman would retain its position as “a cruise ship destination of choice”. Zhongdong Tang, CHEC Regional Director for the Caribbean and Latin America, said his company brings with it “considerable expertise in its field, as CHEC has been recognised globally as a major contractor, with more than USD10 billion worth of projects currently on the go in more than 70 countries.”

However, the firm also brings with it a number of more controversial issues as its parent company remains on the list of firms banned by the World Bank as a result of accusations of fraud and corruption. The firm is also embroiled in controversies in the region, in particular in Jamaica where politicians have been accused of corruption in relation to the various development projects undertaken by CHEC and sub-contractors.

The Cayman government has stated on several occasions that CHEC would be required to engage local labour and local subcontractors. The firm said Thursday that it would be bringing highly technically-skilled and efficient professionals to the project.

“We also intend to use our skills to train the local workforce to ensure that as many local residents benefit from the job creation the new project will produce,” Tang said, adding that CHEC would work with and train local companies in as many aspects of the project as possible “in order to spread the economic benefits a project of such magnitude will bring to the Islands.”

Although Bush has made it clear that he believes CHEC is the best company for the job, the FCO has also made it clear that it will not offer its approval for any major project involving government finances where a competitive tender and best procurement practice is not in evidence.

Under the CHEC proposal, the Chinese firm would finance, as well as design and develop the cruise berthing facility, which would include two finger piers and a massive upland development. However, it would be taking money from passenger taxes that currently go to government coffers in order to recoup its investment. As a result, the project is subject to the Framework for Fiscal Responsibility agreement with the UK that Bush has already signed and which the Foreign and Commonwealth Office is expecting the Cayman government to enshrine in local legislation during next month’s Legislative Assembly meeting.

Comments

Why are we building a massive Dock?  We have nothing and I REPEAT nothing to offer tourist other than 7 miles Beach.  If the dock is constructed and Dart finish connecting the Northsound to  the 7 miles beach, we will no longer have the 7 miles Beach to offer anyone.  The stingrays are disappering, Boatswaine Beach needs to be converted to an environmental science project or discontinued, Pedro Castle needs to be energized and hell is only rocks, so I  again ask this question, Why are we building such a massive dock?  We need to build up our infrastructure and tourist products first, before we build an unacceptable Massive Chinese dock, for nothing.  Concentrate on building up our airline industry and its tourist routes and keep the transquility of our George Town area.  George Town needs to be revived first, before you should consider building such a massive dock.  We don't need these added expenses now, while our economy is dead, dead, dead and depends on its natives being tax to the gills to survive. Stop this stupid idea now, before this madman completely ruin us and generations to come. WE DON'T NEED IT!!!!

This isn't going to happen because there is no money to pay for it.  Cayman is barely paying the interest on the debt it already has, and it cannot be confidently predicted that landing fees will increase enough to finance the dock.The only way to get a free $200 million dock is to give the builder the right to have a hotel and shopping mall

to 9;53
What planet are you on? who says Government is going  to pay for the port.
For the last two years or so, we been talking to the Chinese, who will put up money to invest in building the port. if i were you i would educate myself before looking like a damn fool.  

You are the one that needs to educate yourself.  The repayment comes from the passenger tax - a portion is supposed to go towards paying off the developer, yes, the same passenger tax that CI Government counts as revenue to help balance its books (which it is failing to be balanced, by the way).  When a portion of the passenger tax goes to the developer, it means less revenue for Government.  So either way, my friend, you are going to pay for it through less passenger tax revenue, and guess what will happen if that is not enough?  You guess it, local taxes might go up to make up the shortfall in government revenue.   In addition, the retail operations of the port will generate some income for the developer, who will be operating the facilities for the next 50 years).  So, do you understand now how you will be paying for the port over the next half century?  What is even scarier is that the size of the planned development has tripled and that alone should have you very worried.  There is no such thing as a free lunch.

They expect to be paid back from the passenger landing fees among other things. You need to check your meds.

Bring in CHEC we need the development, cruise ship docks will bring more ships, people and money into the country.  The financial industry is performing quite well but the country needs alternative business and the cruise business brings in lots of money.

'More cruise ships' from where?
The cruise industry is rapidly moving away from the Caribbean into newer and far more lucrative markets in other areas like the Far East. You build the cruise dock without securing any long-term commitments from the major operators, which incidentally you are not going to get, and in a few years that lump of concrete will be sitting in the sunsets as just another reminder of the Cayman Islands complete inability to create a sustainable tourism product.
You really want 'alternative business'? Start working out how to get the European all-inclusive tour operators bringing in plane loads of visitors every week because that is where the money is right now.
But it won't ever happen with the current attitudes because that's too much like hard work while the mythical cruise dock looks like a quick fix with minimal output.
Old saying: Simple fixes usually aren't that simple.

Isn't interesting that the "APPOINTED" architect for the spots project is the same firm that did Boswains Beach! Not to mention at a cost over-run of  some 200%. How do they expect to get the project for their money spent when there is no competition among Design Architects?

deja vu..... almost like 3 years ago....soon come.....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

The next few months will be "velly interesting"after reading all about the corruption going on in Jamaica re the same company.We need to very careful dealing with these folks and not give away anything that will severely harm our income for Govt.We are already giving away way too much in other areas and dont want to compound the issue.

What goes around, comes around and just like what was done to Stefan will return to those who did it to him.  The UK is not going to stand idly by and let one man do as he pleases despite their warning as to the adherance to proper procedures.  Looking forward to it, oh yes I am!

Coincidentaly, asked someone who would know this morning about the GLF schedule and where we would be today. He said the finger for the Oasis would have been complete and the 6000 folks onboard would be walking the street of Georgetown... TODAY!

The sad thing about the "massive upland development" is that it ain't upland.  It is going to be on the 8 acres of fill that will be dumped in Hog Sty Bay to create a new "upland".

And all the shops in GT will close, as none of the tourists  are going to leave the "upland" unless they have signed up for an excursion i.e. stingray city.

This man has to be stopped. There is no way that the port should be given to ANYONE without going through the proper, legal CTC tendering process. Throwing the crumbs of the Spotts renovation to local contractors through the correct bidding process is not going to make this go away. 

Maybe, just maybe, this is related to the group of persons (with Asian features) who were out on the existing dock on Wednesday afternoon having a look around?

"However, the firm also brings with it a number of more controversial issues as its parent company remains on the list of firms banned by the World Bank as a result of accusations of fraud and corruption."
Could this be why Bush was at a World Bank function last week?

Let's wait to hear what all these "Captains" say about Red Bay/South Sound being the Holy Grail of Ship docking and all the rest of that garbage.......

Add new comment

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <!-->
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.