MPs call for Cayman closure

John cryer.jpg(CNS Business): A group of UK members of parliament has proposed an Early Day Motion in the House of Commons in an effort to close down tax havens, including the Cayman Islands. Led by the Labour member for Leyton and Wanstead and former Treasury Select Committee member, John Cryer, the motion calls on the UK government to introduce urgent legislation to help close tax havens and increase transparency “so that the very richest pay their fair share of tax”. In the wake of revelations about US presidential hopeful Mitt Romney's finances, Cryer and his Commons colleagues say they are alarmed by his use of the Cayman Islands, a UK territory, to avoid paying tax.

“As a former member of the Treasury Select Committee, I think it is a disgrace that the Cayman Islands, a tax haven, can enable wealthy corporations and individuals such as Mitt Romney and others in the wealthiest 1% to avoid tax and still be cloaked in secrecy,” Cryer said in an interview with the UK based political blog, Left Foot Forward. “Meanwhile all across the western world, hard-working people are seeing their living standards and take-home pay stagnate or reduced,” the opposition member stated.

The motion, which is being supported by several other labour MPs, including Austin Mitchell and Teresa Pearce, points to the OECD and G20’s position that the use of tax havens by wealthy corporations fuelled the global economic crisis and points to concerns about the continued use of tax havens by the top 1% in the US and UK to avoid paying the correct tax in their own country. It calls on the UK Government to introduce legislation to close tax havens and increase transparency, which the motion claims would see the richest pay their fair share of tax in their respective countries and enable governments worldwide to invest more in jobs and growth. 

Cayman Finance’s UK advisor criticised Cryer’s position and accused him of jumping on the anti Mitt Romney bandwagon.

“Mr Cryer is clearly unaware that Cayman Islands laws encourage full tax cooperation with US and UK authorities. Cayman’s positive moves on transparency have been recognised by the OECD Global Forum which focuses on tax information exchange,” Jack Irving said.

He said that Cryer, despite having been a member of the UK Treasury Select Committee, had confused his own financial issues (as exposed by the Daily Telegraph in a series on MPs’ expenses scandal) which, he said, may explain why Cryer “can’t grasp how the Cayman Islands operates”.

The Telegraph found that in 2004 Cryer and his mother, Anne Cryer, who were both MPs, claimed parliamentary allowances while designating the same flat as their second home. The flat was owned by other members of their family.

Related articles:

Romney's millions in Cayman

Cayman rebukes ABC News

Comments

Mr. Cryer while you are fighting so hard to close down "tax havens" then don't forget, London, New York, Hong Kong etc.
The Cayman Islands is very open and very transparent as evidenced by the amount of agreements signed.
We are not enabling people to not pay taxes. It is solely the responsibility of the individual to declare their assets to their country of residence and it is also the responsibility of that country to throughly investigate if they feel that individual have not done so to avoid paying taxes.
They are free to inquire if that individual has bank accounts in the Cayman Islands.
The Cayman Islands is doing nothing wrong. We have performed due diligence to the best of our ability to ensure that the gains are not illegal (drug trafficking etc).
These MP's in Britian are just upset because a little small overseas territory like the Cayman Islands is a lot richer than England is and have certainly given them a run for their money when it comes to mutual funds, offshore banking etc.
So to the MP's who have suddenly decided to gang up on the Cayman Islands, you all are a bunch of idiots.

What's the difference between an American and a Laboour MP?
On seeing a Ferrari an American will glow and say "One day I'm going to own one of those"
On seeing a Ferrari a Labour MP wil scowl and say "One day I'm going to take that away from him"

Good can come out of this. The Romney affair may actually force the shouting media and their politician friends to finally concede that:

1. Romney and others (including at least one former Democratic President) are structuring their affairs entirely legally under the US Tax Code and other regulations by investing in offshore funds;
2. The designers of the US tax regime knew exactly what they were doing - encouraging long term investments that generate capital gains rather than current income;
3. There is nothing illegal in investing in Cayman funds and other vehicles, or in having an account in Cayman.

This of course has nothing to do with UK politicians stupidly trying to interfere with US tax policy (they will be totally and rightly ignored by the US). And equally they do themselves a great disservice by and have no business trying to interfere in the domestic tax regime of the Cayman Islands. So we should ignore them too, and point out why.
Tim Ridley

Couldn't agree more - this 'issue' arises because of the treatment by the US of different forms of income, this has nothing to do with Cayman, Romney is a savvy business man optimising the tax he pays, this is not tax evasion, far from it

Just in case anyone wanted to 'educate' Mr. Cryer, here is the link to his profile on the BBC: http://news.bbc.co.uk/democracylive/hi/representatives/profiles/25579.stm
His email address: john.cryer.mp@parliament.uk
Feel free to congradulate him for his pompous ignorance that should be an embarrassment to all U.K. MPs. Sadly, they all probably support him for being a good chap by bashing those pesky 'Tax Havens'. 

Exactly what steps are being taken on a day-by-day basis by Cayman Finance and the clowns it uses in London to educate the UK politicians about what Cayman really does? There really is a positive story to be told, folks, but yet again we're left cringing while Irving engages in student politics by attempting to "smear" politicians with personal abuse rather than address the issues. Result? He alienates them yet further and convinces them that there really are no good substantive points to be made in favour of offshore financial jurisdictions. Otherwise he'd make them. Wouldn't he?

Idiotic grandstanding. This guy is just trying to get some headlines that will appeal to the lowest common denominator of UK voters.  You can't "close" a tax haven any more than one country can "close" another country.  And they can't decide what kind of tax laws another country should have (even a dependent territory).  Perhaps the aptly-named Mr Cryer doesn't actually understand that. But most likely he does and he is just making empty noise to get some media attention.
The real problem is that the UK has a draconian, confusing bureaucratic tax system rife with double and even triple and quadruple taxes that fleeces it's most productive citizens and in return provides public services bordering on third world standards.  The difference is accounted for by waste, incompetence, greedy politicians and an army of overpaid and overpensioned civil servants and consultants that generate nothing but inefficiency. That's what makes tax neutral jurisdictions like ours look attractive.
If they really wanted to do something about Cayman they would restructure their own tax system into something more tolerable for its corporate and private citizens, and that provided some commesurate level of benefit. 
If they ever start down that path Cayman should begin to worry.  As long as they limit themselves to impotent motions to "close" Cayman we can sleep easy.

Is tax avoidance illegal?  Last time I checked it wasn't, only tax evasion.  I buy products out of state in the US to 'avoid' paying sales tax, a perfectly legal transaction.  Does anyone really want to pay more tax than they need too?  The tax havens are here to stay and necessary for the world economy. Cryer should get a new campaign focus, he is an idiot.

Last time I heard the "city of London" was the largest ONSHORE tax havens on planet earth, so before Mr. Cryer goes running off his BIG mouth, he should really get his own house in order first before blabbering off on the Cayman Islands.
See a nice article from the guardian published in 2007, thing are worst now!
http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2007/jul/08/tax.business1
 
 
 
 
Do companies pay taxes in the "city of London"

Here are the MPs who signed the Early Day Motion. No surprises here and I always take the view that if Dennis Skinner and Jeremy Corbyn are critical, you must be doing something right. 

Clark, Katy

Labour Party

North Ayrshire and Arran

Corbyn, Jeremy

Labour Party

Islington North

Cryer, John

Labour Party

Leyton and Wanstead

Edwards, Jonathan

Plaid Cymru

Carmarthen East and Dinefwr

Hopkins, Kelvin

Labour Party

Luton North

Mitchell, Austin

Labour Party

Great Grimsby

Morris, Grahame M

Labour Party

Easington

Pearce, Teresa

Labour Party

Erith and Thamesmead

Rotheram, Steve

Labour Party

Liverpool Walton

Skinner, Dennis

Labour Party

Bolsover

 

This goofey MP, John Cryer, is as silly as much of the US press.  Romney has money in Cayman but it most certainly is not there as a tax dodge. He pays income tax on all Cayman assets and all Cayman assets are subject to estate tax. He has hid nothing and for Cryer to assert so  is a hysterical reaction which could serve to financially hurt the Cayman economy. Why dose'nt Cryer know the facts before he  goes public with absurd assertions. He is probably just another headline seeking  hack politician whose sole desire in life is to get re-elected any way he can without accomplishing anything along the way for the people of the UK. Cryer is an apt name.

Right... blame it all on the tax havens!  This is just a scapegoat for many of the elite in powerful positions. They know for certain that tax evasion is not what cause the global recession. They are trying real hard to divert the attention from themselves.

If they are "alarmed" then they are idiots who have no understanding of the global financial system

...or at least the US tax system

"Positive moves on transparency" :  That is a complete joke.  Any country which has a special regime for companies which do not do business in that country and exempts them from disclosing directors, shareholders, accounts etc is rotten to the core.

Jealous are we?  FYI, it is called good customer service. With our banking clients we treat them very well - "No Tax," and they invest here by the billions. If you can't stand us, I suggest you compete with us by treating your own people of wealth with respect.

That is nonsense propaganda. Tax information on its citizens is available to the U.S. through its Tax Information Exchange Agreement with Cayman which was signed back in 2001.   

Add new comment

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <!-->
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.