You are here
Home ›Laws pass at 11th hour
(CNS Business): A number of amendments to critical financial legislation were passed through the Legislative Assembly last week on the eve of a visit from the OECD’s peer review group in connection with tax information. The new laws pushed through at the eleventh hour by government are expected to improve Cayman’s tax information exchange regime and address the remaining recommendations, outlined in the Phase 1 Peer Review by the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes. Five bills were gazetted on Friday but there are already concerns that some will have a significant, negative impact on the local offshore industry.
Although government has stated that the changes clarify and confirm the ability of the Cayman Islands to provide information for tax purposes in line with international standards and improve the overall compliance regime at a time when the offshore industry is under increasing pressure, others say that at least one of the laws has been ill thought out.
The laws in question are the Banks and Trust Companies (Amendment) Bill, 2012; the Companies (Amendment) Bill, 2012; the Exempted Limited Partnership (Amendment) Bill, 2012; the Tax Information Authority (Amendment) Bill, 2012; and the Partnership (Amendment) Bill, 2012.
The amendments include the introduction of sanctions against companies and partnerships that fail to comply with requirements to maintain ownership and identity information; a requirement for exempted and non-resident companies to maintain registered offices with service providers that are licenced by the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority; provisions to allow for the Private Trust Companies Regulations to create offences punishable by a fine not exceeding CI$10,000; and technical changes to the Tax Information Authority Law (2009 Revision).
As a result, government says it has now addressed all of the recommendations contained in the Phase 1 of the peer Review Report in time for the arrival of the phase Peer Review onsite visit, which takes place this week (5-7 September).
However, local company management firms may find amendments to the Companies Law somewhat cumbersome. Clause 20 of the new bill amends section 59 (1) of the original law by inserting after the word “kept”, the words “at its registered office”. In essence, this means that local firms here in the Cayman Islands managing the registered offices of myriad international companies will need to keep comprehensive records including supporting documentation, contracts and invoices, relating to all money received and paid, on sales and purchases and all assets and liabilities for companies registered with them at their Cayman offices.
Pulling no punches local Charted Accountant and Insolvency Practitioner, Chris Johnson, of Chris Johnson Associations, said that the new requirement could spell disaster for the offshore industry and questioned whether government had consulted anyone in the sector before imposing what may prove to be an impossible task.
“The amendment to the Companies Law regarding the maintenance of books of account in the Cayman Islands at Registered Offices is nothing short of a disaster for the Cayman Islands which will quickly bring about the demise of the financial industry,” Johnson said. “No other country in the world demands that accounting records be kept at a registered office. One can imagine the hordes of personnel that would suddenly be upon us and the huge problems being addressed by the immigration department in determining the suitability of staff required to maintain the records, forgetting the language problems.”
He pointed out with over 80,000 companies registered here it could take thousands of people to manage the potential mountain of records generated by the companies the world over but whose offices are merely registered here.
“It is ill conceived and unworkable and clearly shows the calibre of people who are rethinking our laws and composing amendments thereto. I cannot possibly understand why the assistance of the financial community was not obtained and let us hope it is not too late to repair the damage that has been done. Moreover we need an explanation from the premier,” he added.
Companies (Amendment) Bill, 2012
All other amendments are also available at the CIG Gazette Office website
Comment Policy
The comments posted do not necessarily reflect the views of CNS or any individual staff member. All comments are posted subject to approval by CNS. Read more
Recent comments
- I'm sorry but those exactly 6 days 17 hours ago
- The place where a mayor could 1 week 16 hours ago
- Maybe they should stop 1 week 1 day ago
- ‘Being poor’ in this story 1 week 2 days ago
- It should have added 1 week 2 days ago
- Ummm...CUC's new licences in 1 week 2 days ago
- At what point is it 1 week 3 days ago
- Yes there are 1 week 3 days ago
- Err...So where does "If CUC 1 week 3 days ago
- Camana Bay retail rents are 1 week 3 days ago
User login
Search This Site




Comments
anon@anon.com
Actually CNS you are wrong. The bill is only a bill. A statement issued by government today confirms that and that the said issue is being addressed. Please get fact straight before publishing!
CNS: Companies Law stalled
I seem to recall from other
I seem to recall from other reports that the OECD asked the offshore centres to consider such measures something like 2 years ago, plenty of time for consultation. Despite that no one in our incompetent government thought to ask the private sector what the changes would mean. Our incompetents just sign whatever is put in front of them by the OECD without any understanding of what they are doing. Mac and his apppointees strike again.
Not quite right
The real culprits are not the premier or his appointees but the AG and CIMA, who convince themselves they know this stuff and will do anything rather than consult or even speak face-to-face with the private sector for fear that their lack of knowledge and practical experience will be exposed.
So when the financial work dries up, as it surely will now, and places like BVI and Jersey benefit as a result, you'll know who to blame.
There is more than enough
There is more than enough blame to go around in this fiasco but the Minister of Finance/Premier is where the buck stops relating to the financial services sector. The appearance of this disaster has been a long time coming. The Premier selected and appointed the dim bulbs who recommended this stupidity 3 years ago and I suspect that this is only the first element of the disaster to be made public. The Premier's hand picked Team/committee of less than competents with no relevant prior experience dealing with OECD issues clearly have no understanding of the financial service sector in this country or any other. But then again look who appointed them.
anon@anon.com
Are you sure it was passed as a law? It was only Gazetted as a Bill, which is not a law until it is subjected to further process. I would imagine that once public comments are seen in relation to, in particular, the proposed amendments to S59(1) of the Companies Law, some of the amendments, including the one I just mentioned, will not happen. In the UK, all companies are obliged to keep proper books and records that show a true and fair view etc. etc., but they may be kept at the registered office or at another place at the discretion of the directors. If only this amendment were to become law, watch the exodus of companies to jurisdictions with what are considered to be normal requirements.
CNS: Yes, it has been passed into law. There will be a follow-up article to this hopefully tomorrow.
Add new comment