You are here
Home ›Cayman rebukes ABC News
(CNS Business): Responding to a report on a major US television network news station on the use of offshore accounts in the Cayman Islands by Mitt Romney and the corporation he once ran, Cayman Finance said it displayed a total misunderstanding of the role of the Cayman Islands’ tax neutral framework. The Cayman government has also issued a statement calling allegations in the report of improper secrecy in its dealings as an offshore jurisdiction "unfounded". The report on ABC News, which referred to the Cayman Islands as “a notorious Caribbean tax haven, where secrecy is the rule” (an updated video today refers to Cayman as “one of the world’s great tax havens”), said the Republican frontrunner for nomination to run for president used “tax loopholes available only to the super rich”, which resulted in a 15% tax rate, much lower than most Americans.
Washington lawyer Jack Blum told ABC News, “If you have a Cayman corporation, you do not pay any tax to the Cayman government, and the Cayman Islands don’t report any income made to the US government.”
ABC News said Bain Capital, the private equity partnership Romney once ran, had "set up some 138 secretive offshore funds in the Caymans, which are nothing more than a post office box.”
"Contrary to the ABC News report, the Cayman Islands is not a secrecy jurisdiction that facilitates the avoidance or evasion of taxes by US or other persons," the Cayman Islands Ministry of Finance said in a statement Friday. "Although the Cayman Islands does not itself impose income taxes, it shares financial and other confidential information with the IRS and other US federal agencies through various agreements with the US Government. That includes information requested for purposes of enforcing US income tax laws."
The CIG explained that, as in the US, private information is generally protected from public disclosure because such disclosure is not for law enforcement purposes and the information could be used for improper or harmful purposes. "The registration of companies in the Cayman Islands and arrangements for receipt of mail at their registered addresses are essentially the same as arrangements for companies registered in Delaware and elsewhere in the US. Furthermore, despite the unfounded allegations of improper secrecy made in its report, ABC News was able to verify the existence of various investment funds through documents which are publicly available from the Government of the Cayman Islands." (Full statement from the Cayman government's Ministry of Finance attached below.)
“The report displays a total misunderstanding of the role of the Cayman Islands’ tax neutral framework,” Cayman Finance Chairman Richard Coles said Thursday. “All international investors are ultimately responsible for paying their taxes in their home country under their respective laws and there is nothing in the Cayman Islands laws that interferes with that.”
Coles explained in a release from Cayman Finance that not only does the Cayman Islands laws not prevent investors from complying with their tax obligations but that in fact the Cayman Islands are involved in a number of initiatives that encourage full cooperation with US authorities on numerous levels in the area of international cooperation on tax matters. Some of these include; a bilateral agreement which has been in place since 2006, a mutual legal assistance treaty and the Cayman Islands involvement with, and recognition by, the OECD Global Forum which focuses on tax information exchange.
"We do understand that this is election season in the US and typically these types of reports surface as part of that process but it is unfortunate that despite significant evidence to the contrary, journalists would continue to suggest that the laws of the Cayman Islands encourage avoidance of tax," Coles said.
"In fact, our tax neutral framework has played an important role in enabling ordinary Americans to efficiently invest via their pension funds and many US corporations have been able to maintain their international competitiveness through the use of Cayman Islands structures," Coles said. “We are always happy to explain the nature of our regime to journalists and we continue to welcome their queries on how we conduct financial services business in the Cayman Islands.”
The ministry statement noted that Cayman’s legal, regulatory and judicial framework has been recognised as being of high standard by the OECD and other international organizations at the forefront of global tax-information exchange efforts. "The Cayman Islands also has been recognised by the US Department of Justice and the IRS for its high level of cooperation with US law enforcement efforts. For example, in a 2008 report by the US Government Accountability Office, the US Department of Justice describes the Cayman Islands as “one of our best partners” among offshore jurisdictions in law enforcement matters.
"Furthermore," the ministry said, "small international financial centres are an important element that supports the global economy, the ministry maintained, saying that they foster international trade and economic growth as facilities for trade and financial services intermediation, allow collective investment among investors with varying characteristics, provide liquidity to markets, lowering the cost of capital for business, and provide tax-neutral, low-cost facilities for cross-border foreign direct investment aiding economic growth [for G20 countries]."
The Romney campaign also issued a statement saying, “ABC is flat wrong. The Romneys’ investments in funds established in the Cayman Islands are taxed in the very same way they would be if those funds were established in the United States. These are not tax havens and it is false to say so.”
Related articles:
ABC News produces empty and biased story on Mitt Romney and tax havens, by Dan Mitchell
Romney and Cayman Islands, commentary on Offshore Green
Mitt Romney's Cayman Islands skeletons pop out, commentary on Tax Justice Network
Comment Policy
The comments posted do not necessarily reflect the views of CNS or any individual staff member. All comments are posted subject to approval by CNS. Read more
Recent comments
- But George Town is a dump. 19 hours 36 min ago
- Agree with you both 21 hours 31 min ago
- What a breath of fresh Air... 14 hours 38 min ago
- Oh? Where is this credit? I 1 day 7 hours ago
- Kudos to PNA 1 day 10 hours ago
- And a day later they signed, 1 day 12 hours ago
- And delaware, london, and 1 day 21 hours ago
- I hope the G8 extends the 2 days 12 hours ago
- very slippery slope for 3 days 5 hours ago
- Dart starts new office block 3 days 5 hours ago
Latest Classifieds
- Work permit as Online Investor (Personal Investor)
- House for sale - Mt Pleasant WB
- \'09 Honda Fit 4sale
- New Blackberry Q10 Gold Plated and Gold Porsche Design (24 HRS BBM Chat:295941E1)
- Town - Extra Large Bedroom with XL Walk-in Closet
- ONE BEDROOM SHARING $325.00
- CINSA RElays
- Retirement plan
- Make Money Now - Easy as ever
- Stainless Steel Electric Stove & Electric Water Heater for SALE
User login
Search This Site




Comments
We we are at it, can we also
We we are at it, can we also advise them that "The Caymans" do not exisit anywhere on this planet. If it did, so would "The Channels", "The Virgins", etc. Use the proper name for our country.
It is a perfectly acceptable
It is a perfectly acceptable term for the island group containing Grand Cayman and the Lesser Caymans.
No it is not. It is an
No it is not. It is an invention by relative newcomers who also have a tendency spell George Town as one word and refer to the sea as the ocean.
No, it really is not. Your
No, it really is not. Your revisionism will be valuable if China does take over one day. The Lesser Caymans is a valid term.
Lesser Caymans? Excuse me.
Lesser Caymans? Excuse me. We are called the Sister Islands. We are not "Lesser" nor the Grand Caymans nor The Caymans. We are called the Cayman Islands.
The term Sister Islands are a
The term Sister Islands are a modern vote gathering invention. The map on my wall calls them the Lesser Caymans, which are part of the Caymans. You may not like the term. Tough.
Cayman - Mitt Romney- Tax Haven
The truth hurts, sometimes. Cayman's "banking" system, the "offshore banking" industry is set up to protect the wealthy from taxation. It is legal in Cayman, of course, but looked upon as tax evasion by the United States. Whenever the the offshore banking industry and the Cayman Islands are mentioned in film or literature they are always in a negative light because of the nature of the business. Like it or not. Cayman is where the "crooked rich people" hide their money. This is the view held by most people in the world. The truth hurts.
Cayman-Romney
Mr. Anonymous, Cayman is not a tax haven for US citizens. It is not looked at as a place to evade income taxes because you cannot "Hide" income in the Cayman Islands. Everything is reported from a tax standpoint. There is asset protection which is a liability questions but no tax benefit whatsoever. Get your facts straight
The Grisham Effect vs FATCA
Only for those whose source for up-to-date tax strategy was a spy thriller first published in 1981. Any taxable investor implementing grandpa's aggressive tax planning strategy faces a rude awakening in 2013, with massive fines, back taxes, and potential jail time.
......as they say LMAO.
......as they say LMAO. Cayman Islands synonymous with tax evasion by the wealthy. Dirty money is the mainstay of the offshore banking industry. That is why the call it "money laundering" LOL. Spin it anyway you want, it is still dirty. Unfortunately, when you hear "Cayman Islands" these days, it is in a negative light.
Cayman Finance hinders any
Cayman Finance hinders any decent investigations into Cayman's role in world tax evasion and fraud by "suggesting"to local firms that only Cayman Finance speak to visiting journalists. The reality is that a large section of Cayman's offshore industry exists to create tax reduction facilities for the very wealthy at the expense of the poorest in society.
Just one question about the
Just one question about the 'Anti-Money Laundering in the Cayman Islands - fact sheet'.
How many people have been caught in breach of this, how many financial entities of any kind have been shut down or refused registration/incorporation and how many prosecutions have resulted?
If I'm right at the last count the answer was, "ZERO."
This is a 'put up or shut up' moment. There's a huge difference between having rules and/or legislation and using them. Right now CIG is turning a blind eye to all kinds of abuse of the financial system and when CHEC get established in the Islands it can only get worse.
Mitt Romney Cayman Assets
Mitt Romney made the age old mistake of ignoring the issue of "PERCEPTION" in leaving assets in an OFC - perhaps a little naive. The problem with the US critics of OFC's, particularly in the context of the Republican Congressional Primaries is their lack of understanding that US entities have, for many years, simply taken advantage of legally applicable sections of the US tax laws. If they have a "beef" with the reliefs afforded by the existing laws, they should lobby Congress to make the necessary amendmenments to the US Tax Code - I would be interested to see the reaction from " Corporate " America, Cayman is still the current jurisdiction of choice in films and television programmes as a centre for Money Laundering and if there has been a strategic error by successive Governments, it is that none have thrown their hands in the air and admitted, " Yes, in the the old days we did facilitate Money Laundering, but not any more - and not for a long time",. And if any Government, or Regulatory Authority wants to contradict that suggested admission - I will be happy to provide a statement of my personal experiences 35 ago.
they would meet from "corporate" America. If there has been a strategic error by Cayman, the easy name to use as a Money Laundering reference in films and television programmes, it is that officialdom has never put it's hands in the air and admitted that, " yes, we did facilitate Money Laundering in the old days, but those days are long gone ".
I love the double-talk. Of
I love the double-talk. Of course corporations and rich people like Romney put money in places like the Cayman Islands in order to dodge, evade, or avoid taxation. Why else would they do it? (Please don't say because of the "keen service we provide". That's embarrassing)
What most people fail to understand is that Romney and others like him are not crooks. They are just smart and know how to play the game under current rules. This is possible because of the slimeball US Congress back in the 1980s. They wrote laws designed to turn illegal "tax evasion" into legal "tax avoidance". This meant rich guys could now pay less taxes without having to risk prison like they did previously.
It's the oldest game in history. The rich write the rules to favor themselves and screw the rest of society. It's nothing new and unlikely to change anytime soon.
Cayman's role in all of this is not so much controversial due to illegality as it was back in the 1970s when drug dealers and gangsters were routinely flying in to make deposits. It's primarily a moral question these days.
Somehow I suspect, however, that few people in Cayman will lose sleep over questions of morality. After all, morality only becomes a hot topic here when it touches upon issues of sexuality, faith, or violent crime.
Of course millions are hidden
Of course millions are hidden in the Cayman financial institutes.
Don't let politicians fool you.
used “tax loopholes available
used “tax loopholes available only to the super rich”, which resulted in a 15% tax rate, much lower than most Americans.
Actually there is no loophole here, and nothing to do with Cayman, the current tax rate for long term capital gains and investment income in the US is 15%.
Any American can get this rate if they earn their income through investments rather than salary. As the Republicans support this method of taxation, and refuse to increase taxes on the rich, how can they "cry foul" if their potential electorial candidate uses these rules.
Romney was a moron not to
Romney was a moron not to move his investments. Doesn't matter that it's all legal and properly reported to the IRS. If you're rich and want to be president, it would be better not to put the money offshore. It's impossible to explain to the average person.
This is an excellent example
This is an excellent example of how ugly elections get, soon Cayman will see the same thing happening..
Yet again the US bark and
Yet again the US bark and have no bite.
If I am not mistaken, isn't the biggest tax haven in the world located in the US itself in a little place called Delaware?
Be worth checking your facts
Be worth checking your facts - Delaware isn't 'tax neutral' in the way the report above refers to the Cayman Islands and strictly speaking it isn't a tax haven.
Many states also have (or are in the process of creating) legislation that makes it illegal to incorporate companies based in their jurisdiction in Delaware.
That's probably why Romney didn't put his money there.
Using the 'Delaware' agrument doesn't help the case for the Cayman Islands and just looks more like a cheap excuse to cover up wrong-doing. There are plenty of ways to put a valid case for the Caymsan Islands - this isn't one of them.
Add new comment