Boat captain calls out fronting

dexter.PNG(CNS Business): A local watersports operator, who has been in business in Cayman for 25 years, is calling on government to stop the practice of “fronting” whereby a Caymanian owns a boat but allows an expat to become the de facto owner. Dexter Ebanks of Fantasea Tours said the practice is widespread in the watersports industry where boat owners with business licences lease the use of their craft, allowing others to effectively run the company under their licence, which hurts legitimate operators. “If you don’t own the boat, you should not be able to take somebody’s boat and operate that boat as if it’s yours,” Ebanks said. 

At the same time, he wants the government to repeal the law allowing 60-40 ownership of businesses with Caymanians taking the majority share and expats the remainder.

“All that does is encourage fronting,” he said, offering several reasons why he wants to see a halt to this practice. For one thing, he simply considers fronting “wrong”, whether it’s through the 60-40 arrangement or other means. 

Various people have approached him to skirt the rules, he said. “I’ve had people ask me, ‘I have a boat. Can I operate under your licence?’ And my answer is, ‘No, if you are going to operate under my business licence, I want to own that boat and I will try to get you a work permit.’ It’s bothering me that any Tom, Dick or Harry can come here (and make that arrangement).”

In addition, he said the practice hurts smaller watersports operators.
“For far too long, this has happened and everybody in the world can come in here. It’s cutting in on the little guys that want to make a living. There’s a lot of resentment about this.”

As for the 60-40 split, Ebanks was adamant that arrangement should be disallowed. “Who the hell would think that isn’t fronting? If somebody comes here and says, ‘Oh, I want to start a business for $10 million,’ how many Caymanians can come up with $6 million?

“I don’t have a problem with people coming in here to invest as long as you’re not stepping on my corns.”

While the boat captain would not speculate on exactly how many owners lease out their craft, he nevertheless considers the practice common enough that he believes it requires government intervention. “If you want to do away with this perception that people are fronting, pass a law where you have to own your boat. If you are going to operate in the Cayman Islands, you should own that craft.”

He also warned that the apparent ease of leasing the boats to anyone who wants to operate a watersport business raises safety concerns. “If you’re going to operate any boat, you should be legally operating it to the highest standard of safety.”

Raising alarm bells, Ebanks said he has witnessed someone captaining a boat, which he knew belonged to a different person, who got into difficulty stopping to see the stingrays at the sandbar. He had to step in to instruct the other “captain” how to deal with the situation.

“I always brief my people before I leave the dock,” Ebanks said. “Before I get to the sandbar or the reef, I brief them again before they get into the water. I do this not only for safety issues but also for protection of the reef and protection of the stingrays.

“I’m the captain and together with the gentleman working for me, the two of us have about 60 years of experience in the watersports business. And I don’t allow anybody to operate my boat without me being on it. The boat is captained by me with my mate. There are so many people that own a boat that don’t have a clue how to operate that boat.”

Comments

“I don’t have a problem with people coming in here to invest as long as you’re not stepping on my corns.” Says it all Dexter - but interesting to see you objecting to Caymanians making money at the expense of other Caymanians.  
Be careful not to upset those 60% Caymanians sitting on their asses doing nothing and getting paid for it - it could be a trend you are trying to stop or, worse still, opening up a festering can of worms that everybody knows about. It only involves Caymanians so it's "not really something we should investigate" - after all they're making money. Leave Principles, Ethics and Morality out of it - we're talking business here.
 

I must agree with Dexter.  He probably didn't word it right but fronting needs to stop.  I know of a business that the Caymanians are just fronting for them and the people that they are fronting for is ruining the business and not operating it right.  It's bad as a Tourism product as well as for Caymanians.  Caymanians should at least know what is going on in the businesses that they are fronting for and if something goes wrong, they should be held accountable if not more accountable than the expat.

Totally agree with his sentiments.  It is ridiculous that persons come from overseas has no knowledge of the history, culture, and the people that have been engaging in the industry from generation to generation.  You may have to look also at those Caymanians who are selling their soul for the dollar just to get a little cut.  If they only knew they are not making much profit by aligning themselves to outsiders who really don't care about them.  Not only in this industry is disgraceful behaviour being conducted but unfortunatel  it seems to be bogged standard in every industry on island.  Yet those who think profitting are only fooling themselves.  I trust they have a big mirrow to look into and actually see their reflection.  Things have nasty way of coming back to haunt and bite you on the but when you least expect.  Please caymanians wake up.

It takes two to front. One is always a Caymanian.

One word "competition" - get used to it. With it the consumer wins. When the consumer wins, we all win as they come back for more.

Three words - "Rule of Law". It works much better for all concerned, every time.

Three more words "Black market economy" - the result of competition being distorted by bad laws, every time.

Two more words. "Money Laundering"

Two more words "Never enforced"

Good - so we agree it is illegal, and constitutes money laundering. The only difference between us seems to be that I find illegality and money laundering objectionable and you have no problem with it.

And then we come to the practical issue of Caymanians losing benefit of their own economy and what that sets us up for in the future.

Fronting in the seaport business is nothing new. Fronting happens all over the place. I have evidence that one fronter who owns a house worth $300,000 built six condominium projects on the beach. It is all a waste of time and really no one has the enthusiasm or inclination to pursue these situations. Why bother? Caymanians do not seem to want to help themselves and the boards set up to investigate fronting are disinterested or have no clue as to what it is all about. Recruit Henry Fonder and another eleven just men; assuming you can find them in the Cayman Islands.

While Capt Ebanks' arguments, though heartfelt, are a bit naive (there's no objection to an expat owning or leasing a boat and using it for business if he's otherwise complying with the law), Anonymous Caymanian's are disingenuous. We all know that fronting is endemic, but the problem is that the Local Companies (Control) Law is so incompetently drafted that lawful schemes can be structured to avoid it. For example, a Caymanian can (and many do) engage an expat builder and agree (for a fee) to pay him a salary equal to profits. That's an abuse of the spirit of the LCCL, but it's perfectly legal: the Caymanian still owns and controls the business. Additionally, all sorts of games can be played with share capital to circumvent the requirements of the LCCL.

What's needed is for a clever lawyer (not just another failed lawyer political appointee) to be appointed by Govt to investigate the abuses and report on what can be done legislatively to shut them down. Something in particular has to be done about expats effectively owning and running businesses while their Caymanian "partners" sit back and do nothing except rake in a fee. And remember, you can legislate as much as you like, but it's worth nothing without the political will to enforce it.

Actually what you suggest is not perfectly legal and is expressly prohibited by the LCCL legislation. Ignoring provisions does not mean it is poorly drafted... But you are right on the political will front. Instead of disbarring lawyers setting up unlawful schemes we just grant some of them status.

Dexter - when someone approaches you to bend the rules report it to the police. It is a crime. If the police do nothing report it to the press. Call the authorities to task. Fronting is very widespread. Demand of your politicians why there hasn't been a prosecution for decades? Ask the law society why lawyers establish fronting arrangements with impunity - calling it a "shareholders agreement" even though by doing so they may be committing a crime. This law is not anti investor - it can work very well and fairly - but like everything else it is not enforced. Ezzard and Arden - you two seem to care still. Any hope of getting you on board this one?

Complete rubbish:
“If you don’t own the boat, you should not be able to take somebody’s boat and operate that boat as if it’s yours,”
It's called business and just because you can't compete it does not mean you simply stop others. You are so backward here sometimes!

Hanna - by your description of the people of the Cayman Islands as "you" you reveal you are not one of us. What "we" find backward is persons who we welcome here such as yourself calling us backwards when in fact what is backwards is your expectation that you can come here and break our laws and then for it to be our fault.

Just because you identify "Hanna" as "not one of us" hardly invalidates her comments. Are you saying that views of outsiders are not welcome and should not be heard? You might not like what you hear, but listening to, and reacting to, critisim is what helps us improve ourselves.

Agreed. So let's change our law - but that is different from Hanna telling us to ignore or break it.

Why would CNS post this? Easily one of the dumbest arguments / articles I've seen on here yet. The company's law was set up in favor of Caymanians for a reason - to protect Caymanians and require their participation in foreigner business activities in the country. Internal agreements between boat owners, the banks, friends and other business individuals or companies are common business practices privy only to the parties concerned. Ownership of assets and operations can be separate, just like ownership and employment can be. If I can afford a boat and you can't, why can't I lease it to you to offset my expenses and create employment at the same time? What if the ex-pat owns the boat? and wants to lease to a Caymanian? Regardless of who holds the license, if they have a license to operate and can do so safely and legally, what's the problem? XXXX Let's not lobby to change the laws that keep Caymanians owning the businesses in the country.

Caymanians do not allow expats to operate without Caymanian partnership. Now expats get partnership and thats also a problem. You say people should not operate if they do not have a boat. Expats can also buy a boat you know, but can not operate without part local ownership.
So i don't quite get you.  "legitimate operators" ha ha ha.. what is not legitimate about a person bringing in 4 million dollars into your economy and creating jobs????
 

Read the law... And whose economy and jobs for who anyway?

Add new comment

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <!-->
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.