You are here
Home ›Cayman rep under fire in UK
(CNS Business): Lord Blencathra, the director of Cayman Islands London Office, has been criticised in the UK for lobbying on behalf of Cayman’s financial services industry while, as a member of the House of Lords, he is able to vote on legislation affecting the territory. "It can't be right for a member of the legislature, responsible for setting tax policy, to be employed by a well-known tax haven," Shadow Cabinet minister Jon Trickett told the Independent yesterday. However, the British peer maintained that he had been meticulous in ensuring that there was no conflict of interest between his role as lobbyist and his duties in the Lords. "You cannot point to one single incident, speech, vote or question where I have sought to advance the Cayman Islands in the Lords," he told the UK press.
The Ministry of Finance (Financial Services) has three staff members in its London Office, including Lord Blencathra, and its expenses, including salaries, for the 2011/12 financial year is CI$817,763. This does not cover the Department of Tourism staff and operations at the office, which fall under a separate budget.
Lord Blencathra, a former member of the UK Parliament who still maintains close ties and connections to his former colleagues, was appointed as director in November 2011. According to the ministry, his primary role is lobbying the UK Government on behalf of the Cayman Islands Government. At the same time the British peer has claimed up to £5,500 a month in attendance allowances in the House of Lords.
Asked by The Independent if his activities were compatible with the House of Lords code of conduct, Lord Blencathra said, "You have confused lobbying Parliament, which I do not do, with lobbying the Government which I do." The Independent also noted that, despite widespread criticisms from transparency campaigners, there are no clear rules preventing members of the House of Lords acting as paid lobbyists for companies or other governments.
Speaking at a press conference in the Cayman Islands recently, Lord Blencathra explained that his goal was to promote the quality of the financial services industry. He noted that that all of the initiatives that have been written about in the international press, from those impacting fund management to solvency issues, could, if interpreted strictly, pose a threat to this jurisdiction and may limit the ability of Cayman-based firms to compete and sell their products in Europe. He warned that in Europe in particular there were plans for the introduction of various regulations that could threaten it and it was in that arena where there was work for him to do. The peer said he could open some doors to get Cayman’s voice heard on the technical matters relating to such initiatives.
Listing the activities of Lord Blencathra on behalf of Cayman over the past few months, the Independent said he had lobbied the Chancellor George Osborne to reduce the burden of air passenger transport taxes on the Cayman Islands; facilitated an all-expenses-paid trip to Cayman for three senior MPs (although the paper failed to note that this was paid for by the Cayman government).
The Independent said that, following an Early Day Motion in the Commons calling for the Cayman Islands to be closed down as a tax haven, Lord Blencathra had tried to introduce the MP responsible, the former Treasury Select Committee member John Cryer, to members of a Cayman Islands delegation in London.
Cryer told the paper, "I just got this email from Lord Blencathra asking if I would meet with a delegation from the Caymans who were in London. I had no idea at the time that he was being paid to lobby for them. It is outrageous for him, as a parliamentarian, to be doing that. Members of the House of Lords should not be representing foreign governments. If those governments want to lobby people they should be doing it themselves."
The Independent said he had also approached the International Bar Association to discuss its task force on human rights and illicit financial flows before the task force had launched, and that he sent a letter to the Labour MP Angela Eagle after she raised a question about his appointment.
Comment Policy
The comments posted do not necessarily reflect the views of CNS or any individual staff member. All comments are posted subject to approval by CNS. Read more
Recent comments
- But George Town is a dump. 15 hours 21 min ago
- Agree with you both 17 hours 16 min ago
- What a breath of fresh Air... 10 hours 23 min ago
- Oh? Where is this credit? I 1 day 3 hours ago
- Kudos to PNA 1 day 5 hours ago
- And a day later they signed, 1 day 8 hours ago
- And delaware, london, and 1 day 16 hours ago
- I hope the G8 extends the 2 days 8 hours ago
- very slippery slope for 3 days 59 min ago
- Dart starts new office block 3 days 1 hour ago
Latest Classifieds
- Work permit as Online Investor (Personal Investor)
- House for sale - Mt Pleasant WB
- \'09 Honda Fit 4sale
- New Blackberry Q10 Gold Plated and Gold Porsche Design (24 HRS BBM Chat:295941E1)
- Town - Extra Large Bedroom with XL Walk-in Closet
- ONE BEDROOM SHARING $325.00
- CINSA RElays
- Retirement plan
- Make Money Now - Easy as ever
- Stainless Steel Electric Stove & Electric Water Heater for SALE
User login
Search This Site




Comments
It is a shame for Mr. Cryer
It is a shame for Mr. Cryer to refer to the Caymans. As an MP he should know better. I am willing to bet he never refers to the Channels. Please use the full and correct name when referring to our little piece of the world, Mr. Cryer.
"The Caymans" is perfectly
"The Caymans" is perfectly correct. It refers to the geopgraphical group of islands comprising Grand Cayman and the Lesser Caymans, together "the Caymans".
No such place as "the Lesser
No such place as "the Lesser Caymans".
"geopgraphical". You are slipping, Dick.
I apologise for the
I apologise for the typographical error. I will self-flagellate later.
Cayman Brac and Little Cayman comprise the Lesser Caymans. The term "Sister Islands" is an example of politicians pandering to political correctness (or chasing votes in the Lesser Caymans).
We are called the Sister
We are called the Sister Islands not the Lesser Caymans. We were never called the Lesser Caymans. It was Lesser Islands. Who would want to be called Lesser? I would prefer that they drop Sister Islands as well and just call us what we are: Cayman Brac and Little Cayman. They are two different and distinct islands.
Completely wrong. It always
Completely wrong. It always the Lesser Caymans and many maps today still show them as such. Lesser is a geopgraphical reference, in contrast to "Grand" Cayman.
http://mapcarta.com/19506914
Get over it. That's how
Get over it. That's how people talk.
clothes
He should be for dressing like rupert the bear!
Marek on clothes
Very funny Marek. Obviously you are unaware of the formal dress code for persons who have Scottish ancestry, which the former 'Mr Maclean' has.
Hoots mon those ur ma breeks!
Hoots mon those ur ma breeks! Ye'll get yir heid in yir hauns an yir lugs ti pley wi!
The most intriguing part that
The most intriguing part that the independent and CNS missed is how the Lord was recruited to replace a Caymanian and if the poster above one jack irvin was somehow involved in this KGB style international fiasco for the Cayman islands.
Independent
The one good thing about the Independent is that they have taken apart Lord Ashcroft. This person was the PuppetMaster behind the many companies in the Oxford Group. These included Hadsphaltic whose employees and creditors including the Cayman Islands Government are owed huge amounts of money.
It is not a secret that this person is involved in a media company that has a licence in the Cayman Islands where there is local objection.
As the court appointed liquidator of Hadsphaltic I can inform the public that this person should not be permitted to do business in our islands. Just check out what the leaders think about him in the Turks and Caicos Islands and Belize.
Independent
Well said Chris.
Bills to Pay
Rumour has it that those UK Office expenses, including salaries for 3 staff, now also includes consultancy fees for Lord B's wife and her son. Any confirmation or denial to that yet?
Lord Blencathra
It's also the newspaper owned by a former KGB agent.
Only a matter of time before
Only a matter of time before the issue of his Parliamentary expenses is also resurrected.
I'm starting to think he
I'm starting to think he might be worth it.....
Hilarious the way the
Hilarious the way the Independent tries to portray this as some investigative exclusive - CNS reported on this last year.
The content of the articles also suggest the journalists know little or nothing about Cayman and are certainly entirely ignorant about the financial services industry. Very poor from the Independent; Mind you this is the paper that brought us the serial plagiarist, fantasist and libelist that is Johann Hari.
As usual
Fire Him, clear conflict of interest.
Add new comment